Austerity Measures
By Miika Makela | WBN News Global, WBN News Europe , WBN Finance| Sept 25, 2025 | CANADA
When banks collapse, governments and regulators often turn to a tool that shifts the burden squarely onto those least expecting it: the bail-in. Unlike taxpayer-funded rescues, bail-ins compel shareholders, bondholders, and even depositors to absorb losses directly. It is framed as “fair,” a way of keeping public finances intact. In practice, it redistributes risk in a way that undermines confidence, disrupts businesses, and exposes citizens to sudden financial loss.
How a Bail-In Functions
A bail-in restructures a failing bank by forcing internal stakeholders to take losses. Shareholders may see equity wiped out, bondholders can be written down, and deposits above legal guarantee levels—typically €100,000 in the EU—may be frozen, converted to equity, or partially confiscated.
The mechanism is embedded in regulatory frameworks such as the EU’s Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD). On paper, this protects taxpayers. In reality, it forces individuals and businesses that relied on the bank for security or operational funds to carry losses they never agreed to underwrite.
Impact on Citizens
For citizens, the most direct effect is the loss of deposits above the insured threshold. Families saving for retirement, education, or property can see years of careful planning vanish overnight. Even when funds are not confiscated outright, forced conversion into equity ties their future to the fate of a bank already in distress.
Trust, once broken, is not easily restored. A bail-in teaches depositors that banks are not neutral custodians of wealth, but potential claimants on it. The rational response is to withdraw, transfer abroad, or split deposits across institutions—all of which reduce system stability.
Retirees face additional risks. Pension funds often hold bank bonds, which are subject to bail-ins. When written down, these losses reduce future income streams for individuals who cannot recover the shortfall.
Impact on Corporations
Businesses are also vulnerable. Companies often hold balances far above deposit insurance limits to cover payroll, supplier payments, and investment projects. A bail-in can freeze these accounts without warning, halting operations and triggering insolvencies.
The effect cascades. Employees go unpaid, suppliers are forced to delay or cancel orders, and entire production chains seize up—not because of poor management decisions, but because their bank failed. Small and mid-sized enterprises, with limited access to international accounts, are particularly exposed.
Systemic Economic Effects
Bail-ins intensify the contractionary dynamics already present in austerity environments. By removing liquidity from households and corporations, they suppress consumption and investment simultaneously. Tax revenues fall, unemployment rises, and governments often tighten fiscal policy further.
They also generate an enduring climate of uncertainty. Citizens and firms learn that rules can be altered quickly and thresholds are not inviolable. The predictable outcome is capital flight by those with means, while the middle and lower classes—those least able to move funds abroad—absorb the largest losses.
Political and Social Dimensions
The stated rationale for bail-ins is protecting public finances. But taxpayers and depositors are often the same people. The difference lies only in how the cost is extracted: through direct confiscation rather than taxation.
This distinction matters politically. Bail-ins allow governments to present themselves as fiscally responsible while obscuring the fact that ordinary savers, workers, and small businesses are financing the cleanup. The result is declining trust not only in banks but in political institutions. Public disillusionment opens the door to populist movements that thrive on the perception—often accurate—that established parties protect financial systems at the expense of citizens.
Possible Future Outcomes
The global banking sector remains deeply interconnected with sovereign debt and volatile capital markets. Bail-ins, now standardized in resolution frameworks, are likely to recur in future crises. Scenarios include:
- Regional bank failures, where depositors above insurance limits are forced into losses.
- Corporate liquidity shocks, when operational balances vanish overnight.
- Pension fund erosion, as holdings of bank bonds are written down.
- Cross-border disputes, with foreign depositors demanding restitution from governments unwilling to compensate them.
Each scenario compounds financial insecurity and undermines public trust in the stability of the banking system.
Conclusion
Bail-ins are far from neutral instruments of reform. They represent a calculated policy choice that redistributes the costs of financial failure downward, from institutions and executives to citizens, retirees, and businesses. By erasing deposits, converting savings into equity, or writing down pensions, they undermine both economic security and the trust required for the financial system to function. The effects ripple outward: reduced consumption, corporate insolvencies, suppressed investment, and rising unemployment.
At their core, bail-ins expose the structural imbalance of modern finance: privatizing gains and socializing losses. Profits earned during periods of reckless expansion accrue to shareholders and executives, while the losses, once realized, are shifted onto depositors and working households who never signed up to be risk-bearers. What is marketed as stability is in fact redistribution—away from those who profited and toward those who relied on the system’s promises of safety.
The long-term consequence is corrosive. Confidence in banks erodes, political legitimacy is weakened, and societies fracture as citizens realize that austerity-era policies demand sacrifices from them while shielding the architects of financial crises. Bail-ins may close the books of failing banks, but they open deeper wounds in economies and democracies alike.
Miika Makela, CFA
LinkedIn: http://bit.ly/46shFb1
#Bail In #Banking Crisis #Austerity #Financial Policy #Economic Impact #Depositors #Pensions #Corporate Finance #Banking Reform #Monetary Policy #Financial Stability #Capital Markets
Editor for WBN: Chris Sturges
Subscription to WBN and being a Contributor is Free.
Members Discussion