By Elke Porter | WBN News World Sports | January 12, 2026
Subscription to WBN and being a Writer is FREE!

FIFA's Money Machine Meets Reality as Host Cities Face $100-200M Bills While Organization Projects Record Revenue

With exactly 150 days until kickoff, the 2026 FIFA World Cup stands poised to become the most lucrative sporting event in history—generating an estimated $11-13 billion in revenue for FIFA during the 2023-2026 cycle. Yet behind the staggering projections of $62 billion added to global GDP and 290,000 jobs created in the United States, a stark financial reality confronts the 16 host cities across North America: each will shoulder between $100 to $200 million in costs related to infrastructure, security, and logistics while FIFA keeps virtually all tournament revenue.

As visitors prepare to descend on cities spanning three nations, safety considerations emerge alongside economic questions. Which cities offer the best combination of security, infrastructure, and visitor experience? And critically, who truly profits from the world's largest sporting event?

The FIFA Business Model: $11 Billion In, Cities Left Holding the Bill

FIFA projects unprecedented financial returns for the 2026 tournament. Broadcasting rights sales have reached a record $3.92 billion, while marketing and commercial rights are expected to generate $1.78 billion from partnerships with Adidas, Coca-Cola, Visa and other global brands. With 104 matches across 16 cities—up from the traditional 64-game format—hospitality and ticketing revenues are forecast to reach record levels.

The expanded 48-team format and favourable North American time zones for global broadcasting create what FIFA describes as optimal commercialization conditions. Television broadcasting rights total $4,264 million for the cycle, with 43% already contracted. Hospitality and ticket sales amount to a record budget level of $3,097 million, driven by FIFA's strategic decision to in source hospitality services rather than outsource them.

Yet this financial windfall flows almost entirely to FIFA. In an unprecedented arrangement, the 2026 FIFA World Cup is the first time that there is no organizing committee in the host country—FIFA is running all aspects of the tournament itself from new headquarters in Coral Gables, Florida, and will keep essentially all revenue from the World Cup.

The Cost Reality for Host Cities

The financial burden on host cities tells a dramatically different story than FIFA's revenue projections. Consider these commitments:

Direct Costs:

  • Each city expected to shoulder between $100 to $200 million in costs related to infrastructure, security, and logistics
  • The U.S. government has authorized $625 million in funding via H.R. 1, earmarked for security requirements and not local host support
  • Toronto has estimated its portion of hosting will cost $380 million, an increase of $80 million compared to a 2022 forecast, with roughly a third of the total expense going toward policing and security
  • Ottawa committed $104 million to help Toronto host games

Lost Revenue:

  • FIFA demanded sales tax exemptions as a price for hosting—Missouri will lose around $1.9 million per game, totaling over $11 million for six Kansas City matches
  • Florida expects to lose around $7.4 million on games played in Miami
  • Georgia expects to lose up to $25 million in state and local sales taxes on World Cup games played in Atlanta

FIFA Requirements:

  • FIFA requires host cities to provide office space equipped with state-of-the-art amenities, free of charge
  • 244-page Host City Agreements outline precise requirements for transportation, fan festivals, security protocols, and advertising restrictions
  • Cities receive limited commercial opportunities, with FIFA sponsors maintaining first right of refusal

The Economic Justification: Promise vs. Reality

FIFA justifies these demands with promises of massive economic returns. The FIFA World Cup 2026 analysis highlights that across the host countries 6.5 million people are expected to attend the tournament. Individual cities project substantial impacts:

  • Kansas City expects a $653 million economic boost with an estimated 650,000 unique visitors
  • Los Angeles County expects total economic impact of $730 million, with the City of Los Angeles seeing almost $256 million and Inglewood over $17 million
  • Toronto expects to create more than 3,500 jobs, attract 300,000 out-of-town visitors and generate approximately $393 million in GDP for Toronto and $456 million for Ontario

Yet historical data raises questions about these projections. Twelve of the last 14 World Cups hosted since 1966 have resulted in financial losses for host countries, with losses ranging from hundreds of millions to billions of dollars, and the last three World Cups having an average return on investment of negative 31 percent.

Some cities have taken notice. Chicago, the third-largest U.S. city, chose not to host World Cup games because city officials said it would leave the city in debt. Santa Clara stands as one of the only cities not breaking the bank to prepare, protected by Measure J from 2010 which protects the city's general fund, while the Bay Area Host Committee is paying $25 million to modify the stadium's field per FIFA regulations.

Kansas City's Docket Memo notes that the Kansas City Convention and Tourism Fund will be used for $15 million in support of the hosting, and the question "Does the legislation generate revenue, leverage outside funding or deliver a return on investment?" was answered, "No".

All 16 Host Cities Ranked by Safety (1-10 Scale, 10 = Safest)

As millions prepare to travel across North America for the tournament, safety considerations factor heavily into planning decisions. Based on FBI crime statistics, local security assessments, international travel advisories, and infrastructure analysis, here are all 16 host cities ranked by visitor safety:

TIER 1: SAFEST CITIES (Safety Rating: 9-10)

1. Toronto, Ontario - Safety Rating: 9.5/10

  • Matches: 6 games
  • Stadium: BMO Field (capacity 45,500 - smallest World Cup venue)
  • Why It's Safe: Lowest violent crime rates among all host cities; excellent public transit (TTC subway and streetcar systems); strong governmental security commitment; Canadian hospitality and politeness create welcoming environments; comprehensive emergency services
  • Visitor Note: Hotel capacity at premium, book early; June weather mild to warm with occasional rain
  • Business Angle: Estimated cost $380 million with federal government committing $104 million; expects to create 3,500+ jobs and attract 300,000 out-of-town visitors

2. Vancouver, British Columbia - Safety Rating: 9.5/10

  • Matches: 7 games
  • Stadium: BC Place (capacity 54,500)
  • Why It's Safe: Among lowest crime rates in North America; compact downtown with excellent public transit; BC Place's retractable roof; stunning natural setting; international character and 2010 Winter Olympics experience
  • Visitor Note: Hotel capacity nearly fully booked; temperate climate with possible rain
  • Business Angle: Projects C$532-624 million in total costs, seeking $65 million in additional federal support, with economic impact estimated at $2.14-3.45 billion

3. Seattle, Washington - Safety Rating: 8.5/10

  • Matches: 6 games including one Round of 16 match
  • Stadium: Lumen Field (capacity 69,000)
  • Why It's Safe: Low violent crime risk; moderate property crime in downtown; minimal terrorism threat; excellent proximity to Vancouver; strong public transit; well-established major event management track record
  • Visitor Note: Be vigilant with belongings in crowded transit hubs; Pacific Northwest temperate June weather
  • Business Angle: Expects nearly billion-dollar economic boost; Washington State allocated $47 million toward preparations

4. Boston, Massachusetts - Safety Rating: 8/10

  • Matches: 7 games
  • Stadium: Gillette Stadium in Foxborough (capacity 65,000)
  • Why It's Safe: Low to moderate property crime; minimal terrorism risk; stadium location in Foxborough (30 miles from Boston) provides security advantages through isolated perimeter control
  • Visitor Note: Transportation challenges from Boston proper to Foxborough
  • Business Angle: Eligible for $46.05 million from federal security program; committed $10 million in state transportation funding; tracking $22.6 million in direct costs for security and emergency services; invested $32.7 million in capital improvements to adjacent Commuter Rail station

TIER 2: VERY SAFE CITIES (Safety Rating: 7.5-8)

5. Kansas City, Missouri/Kansas - Safety Rating: 8/10

  • Matches: 6 games including one quarterfinal
  • Stadium: Arrowhead Stadium (capacity 76,000)
  • Why It's Safe: Moderate urban crime; low terrorism threat; minimal protest risk; lower density than coastal cities; excellent central U.S. positioning; Arrowhead holds Guinness World Record for loudest crowd roar
  • Visitor Note: Mid-sized American city experience; passionate fan engagement
  • Business Angle: Expects $653 million economic impact with 650,000 unique visitors; committed $15 million from Convention and Tourism Fund despite acknowledging no direct financial return

6. Dallas, Texas - Safety Rating: 8/10

  • Matches: 9 games including one semifinal
  • Stadium: AT&T Stadium in Arlington (capacity 80,000)
  • Why It's Safe: Moderate property crime in urban areas; low terrorism risk; strong law enforcement presence; Texas's supportive security funding stance; stadium location in Arlington separate from downtown provides better security perimeter control
  • Visitor Note: Sprawling geography requires heavy reliance on ride-share; extreme heat possible in June/July
  • Business Angle: Texas provides strong financial commitment; extensive major event experience; AT&T Stadium handles large-scale events routinely

7. Atlanta, Georgia - Safety Rating: 7.5/10

  • Matches: 8 games including one semifinal
  • Stadium: Mercedes-Benz Stadium (capacity 75,000)
  • Why It's Safe: Elevated urban crime in certain neighborhoods balanced by strong security infrastructure; low terrorism risk; Mercedes-Benz Stadium (opened 2017) features advanced security technology; excellent public transit connectivity via MARTA
  • Visitor Note: Research neighborhood safety levels carefully; conditions vary significantly across metro Atlanta
  • Business Angle: Georgia allocated $25 million specifically for World Cup hosting; Super Bowl LIII hosting provides valuable operational knowledge; expects to lose up to $25 million in sales tax exemptions

8. New York/New Jersey - Safety Rating: 7.5/10

  • Matches: 8 games including THE FINAL on July 19, 2026
  • Stadium: MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey (capacity 82,500)
  • Why It's Safe: As host of World Cup Final, receives highest security designation; unparalleled law enforcement experience; extensive surveillance networks; coordinated counter-terrorism infrastructure; elevated terrorism risk due to high-profile target status offset by extremely robust security presence
  • Visitor Note: Complex public transit system; stadium location in New Jersey complicates transit planning
  • Business Angle: Region allocated $19.4 million in state funding with additional millions pending; New York metropolitan area law enforcement has unmatched major event experience

9. San Francisco Bay Area, California - Safety Rating: 7.5/10

  • Matches: 6 games
  • Stadium: Levi's Stadium in Santa Clara (capacity 71,000)
  • Why It's Safe: FBI data shows 1,331 thefts per 100,000 residents in Santa Clara—lowest among all U.S. host cities; stadium location in Santa Clara offers significantly better security metrics than San Francisco proper; venue opened in 2014 with state-of-the-art security features
  • Visitor Note: Moderate concern about homelessness-related petty crime in San Francisco; focus on Santa Clara/Silicon Valley area
  • Business Angle: Santa Clara is one of the only cities not breaking the bank to prepare—protected by Measure J from 2010 which protects the city's general fund; Bay Area Host Committee paying $25 million to modify stadium's field per FIFA regulations; California provided limited $7 million state support

TIER 3: SAFE WITH PRECAUTIONS (Safety Rating: 6.5-7)

10. Los Angeles, California - Safety Rating: 7/10

  • Matches: 8 games including potential final
  • Stadium: SoFi Stadium in Inglewood (capacity 70,000)
  • Why It's Relatively Safe: SoFi Stadium (opened 2020) represents cutting-edge venue design with extensive security infrastructure; region has extensive Olympics and Super Bowl experience
  • Visitor Note: Elevated property crime in certain neighborhoods; ICE enforcement operations have occurred; moderate protest concerns; navigation challenges for unfamiliar visitors
  • Business Angle: Expects total economic impact of $730 million across LA County, with City of Los Angeles seeing $256 million and Inglewood over $17 million; received only $10 million in state funding, forcing reliance on private funding and federal security grants

11. Houston, Texas - Safety Rating: 7/10

  • Matches: 7 games
  • Stadium: NRG Stadium (capacity 72,000)
  • Why It's Relatively Safe: Substantial major event experience including recent FIFA Club World Cup matches; strong "fandom" culture
  • Visitor Note: FBI data indicates 2,957 thefts per 100,000 residents—second highest among U.S. cities; extreme heat and humidity in June/July; severe thunderstorms possible
  • Business Angle: Houston hosting Portugal twice (potential Cristiano Ronaldo appearances) elevates demand; ticket prices range from $140 to $700 for group-stage games

12. Miami, Florida - Safety Rating: 7/10

  • Matches: 7 games including one quarterfinal and third-place match
  • Stadium: Hard Rock Stadium (capacity 65,000)
  • Why It's Relatively Safe: Hard Rock Stadium ($350 million renovation completed 2016) offers modern amenities and improved security; Miami-Dade County pledged $46 million in subsidies
  • Visitor Note: Moderate property crime targeting tourists; extreme heat and humidity; potential severe weather events; bilingual environment benefits Spanish-speaking visitors
  • Business Angle: Expects to lose around $7.4 million on tax exemptions; international character attracts global visitors

13. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania - Safety Rating: 6.5/10

  • Matches: 6 games
  • Stadium: Lincoln Financial Field (capacity 69,000)
  • Why Precautions Are Necessary: FBI data shows 3,235 thefts per 100,000 residents—highest among all U.S. host cities; elevated concern about property crime on public transportation; moderate urban crime
  • Visitor Note: Exercise heightened vigilance with belongings; avoid displaying valuables; use official transportation; rich history and walkable downtown offer excellent tourism but require street-smart navigation
  • Business Angle: Seeking $10 million in local funding plus federal security support; anticipates 500,000 travelers; projects $770 million in regional economic impact

TIER 4: MODERATE SAFETY CHALLENGES (Safety Rating: 5.5-6.5)

14. Mexico City, Mexico - Safety Rating: 6/10

  • Matches: 5 games including opening match on June 11
  • Stadium: Estadio Azteca (capacity 87,000)
  • Why Precautions Are Critical: International security analysts rate as "moderate risk"; moderate to high risk of petty crime (pickpocketing, theft) especially in public transit and tourist areas; express kidnapping risk in certain neighborhoods; cartel activity in broader region; altitude challenges (7,350 feet) causing shortness of breath
  • Why It's Manageable: Estadio Azteca located in Coyoacán neighborhood with very low crime—some of lowest homicide rankings in the country; Mexican government increased military and police presence specifically for World Cup; successfully hosted two previous World Cups (1970, 1986) without major security incidents
  • Visitor Note: Focus on established tourist neighborhoods (Roma, Condesa, Polanco, Coyoacán); use only registered ride-share services (Uber, Didi), never street taxis; avoid areas like Iztapalapa and Gustavo A. Madero; arrive early to acclimate to altitude
  • Business Angle: Incredible cultural richness; historic significance; passionate football culture offer experiences unavailable elsewhere; stadium makes history as only venue to host three World Cups

15. Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico - Safety Rating: 6.5/10

  • Matches: 4 games
  • Stadium: Estadio Akron (capacity 48,000)
  • Why Precautions Are Important: Moderate risk of petty crime; presence of CJNG (Jalisco New Generation Cartel) in broader region; moderate concern about unofficial "police" scams; lower risk than Mexico City for express kidnapping
  • Why It's More Manageable: Offers more manageable experience than Mexico City while maintaining authentic Mexican culture; birthplace of mariachi music and tequila; Estadio Akron (opened 2010) features modern security infrastructure; enhanced security protocols for World Cup
  • Visitor Note: Stay in established tourist areas (Colonia Americana, Centro Histórico); use official transportation; avoid peripheral neighborhoods after dark; compact tourist district simplifies navigation
  • Business Angle: Cultural capital of Mexico provides rich experiences; tourists rarely directly targeted by cartels

16. Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico - Safety Rating: 5.5/10

  • Matches: 4 games including one Round of 32 match
  • Stadium: Estadio BBVA (capacity 53,000)
  • Why It Has Highest Security Challenges: Elevated concern about cartel presence and territorial conflicts; moderate to high risk of petty crime; concerns about kidnapping in certain areas; variable safety levels across different neighborhoods; industrial city has faced security challenges related to drug cartel disputes
  • Why Visitors Still Attend: Mexican authorities significantly increased police and military presence for World Cup; affluent San Pedro Garza García neighborhood and downtown core have enhanced security protocols; Estadio BBVA (opened 2015) represents Mexico's most modern stadium with state-of-the-art security systems; proximity to U.S. border (140 miles to Laredo, Texas) provides reassurance
  • Visitor Note: Book accommodations exclusively in San Pedro Garza García or central Monterrey; use only reputable ride-share or hotel-arranged transportation; plan activities through established tour operators; avoid displaying expensive items; research neighborhoods carefully before venturing out
  • Business Angle: Unique opportunities combining football with outdoor adventure (García caves, Sierra del Fraile mountains, Cola de Caballo waterfalls); residents known for hospitality and regional pride

Security Infrastructure Across All Cities

Despite varying baseline crime statistics, all 16 host cities have implemented unprecedented security measures:

Federal Coordination:

  • U.S. government authorized $625 million in funding via H.R. 1, earmarked for security requirements
  • Joint task forces combining federal, state/provincial, and local police with military support
  • Enhanced security technologies and fan zone monitoring
  • Coordinated intelligence sharing across three nations

Technology Deployment:

  • Advanced surveillance systems at all venues
  • Facial recognition technology at entry points
  • Drone detection and countermeasures
  • Cybersecurity operations centers
  • Real-time threat assessment platforms

Personnel Commitments:

  • Toronto allocating roughly a third of its $380 million total expense toward policing and security
  • Thousands of additional officers deployed during match days
  • Private security contracted for fan festivals and transit hubs
  • Volunteer coordination for crowd management

The Business Reality: Who Really Wins?

The stark contrast between FIFA's projected $11-13 billion revenue and the financial burden on host cities raises fundamental questions about mega-event economics.

FIFA's Position:

  • Total investment for the benefit of member associations, confederations and zonal/regional associations amounts to $2,250 million for the full cycle—representing an almost sevenfold increase in football development investment compared to programs in place prior to 2016
  • Argues that global football development justifies revenue concentration
  • Claims long-term tourism benefits offset immediate costs

Host City Reality:

  • Twelve of the last 14 World Cups since 1966 resulted in financial losses for host countries
  • Tax exemptions, security costs, and infrastructure investments create immediate deficits
  • The 11 U.S. World Cup host cities facing collective shortfall of at least $250 million due to highly restrictive deal from FIFA
  • Economic impact studies often fail to materialize at projected levels

The Winners:

  • FIFA's coffers swell with broadcast, sponsorship, and hospitality revenue
  • Global brands (Adidas, Coca-Cola, Visa) gain unprecedented exposure
  • Hotels and airlines see significant revenue spikes
  • Select hospitality and tourism businesses benefit

The Losers:

  • Taxpayers funding infrastructure and security without guaranteed returns
  • Local governments losing sales tax revenue that otherwise would support public education, health care, and other public services
  • Small businesses facing disruption during preparations and matches
  • Cities assuming financial risk while FIFA maintains revenue control

Visitor Recommendations by City Type

For fans planning their World Cup experience, choosing cities based on priorities makes financial and experiential sense:

Maximum Safety Priority: Toronto, Vancouver, Seattle, Boston

  • Lowest crime rates, best public services, easiest navigation
  • Higher accommodation costs but peace of mind

Best Value/Experience Balance: Kansas City, Dallas, Atlanta

  • Moderate costs, strong infrastructure, authentic American experiences
  • Reasonable safety with standard urban precautions

Budget-Conscious Fans: Houston, Philadelphia, certain Mexico matches

  • Lower accommodation costs than coastal cities
  • Requires more careful planning and neighborhood research

Cultural Immersion: Mexico City, Guadalajara, Monterrey

  • Authentic Mexican football passion, rich cultural experiences
  • Demands heightened awareness and preparation

Premium Final Experience: New York/New Jersey

  • Highest security designation for World Cup Final
  • Maximum costs but once-in-a-lifetime opportunity

The Five-Month Countdown

With 150 days until opening match at Estadio Azteca, the business and security preparations intensify:

Immediate Priorities:

  • Finalizing transportation networks and fan festival locations
  • Deploying security personnel and technology systems
  • Managing hotel capacity constraints in Vancouver, Toronto, and major U.S. cities
  • Coordinating three-nation visa and border protocols
  • Testing emergency response systems

Open Questions:

  • Will projected economic impacts materialize at forecast levels?
  • Can cities recoup their $100-200 million investments?
  • Will safety measures adequately protect 6.5 million anticipated visitors?
  • How will the unprecedented three-nation format affect logistics?

Certain Outcomes:

  • FIFA will generate record revenue approaching $13 billion
  • Host cities will absorb significant costs with uncertain returns
  • The tournament will proceed across all 16 cities regardless of financial concerns
  • Safety will depend on both infrastructure and individual visitor awareness

Conclusion: Spectacle vs. Sustainability

The 2026 FIFA World Cup exemplifies the tension between global sporting spectacle and local financial reality. FIFA's business model concentrates revenue at the top while distributing costs and risks downward to host cities and taxpayers. The organization's unprecedented $11,000 million revenue for 2023-2026, up $4,560 million from the previous cycle, stands in sharp contrast to the collective $250 million shortfall facing U.S. host cities.

For the millions planning to attend matches across North America, safety considerations range from excellent (Canada's two cities) to manageable with precautions (Mexican hosts). The unprecedented security deployment—funded largely by host nations rather than FIFA—aims to protect visitors while the organization profits.

The tournament will deliver unforgettable football and cultural experiences. Whether it delivers promised economic returns to the cities bearing its costs remains the $11 billion question.

Elke Porter at:
Westcoast German Media
LinkedIn: Elke Porter or
WhatsApp:  +1 604 828 8788.
Public Relations. Communications. Education

Let’s bring your story to life — contact me for books, articles, blogs, and bold public relations ideas that make an impact.

TAGS:

  • #WorldCup2026
  • #FIFA2026
  • #FIFABusiness
  • #WorldCupSafety
  • #SoccerNews
  • #WC2026HostCities
  • #WBN News World Sports Edition
  • #Elke Porter

Share this article
The link has been copied!