Sponsor 20: If You Want No Consequences, Take Responsibility
Vancouver needs compassion and accountability. Support recovery while protecting communities and holding everyone responsible for harmful behaviour.
Sponsor 20 Challenge
By Elke Porter | WBN News Vancouver | August 15, 2026
Subscription to WBN and being a Writer is FREE!
There is an increasingly familiar argument in Vancouver: people struggling with addiction, homelessness, or mental illness are among society's most vulnerable, and therefore we should be extremely careful about imposing consequences on them.
I agree with the first part. People struggling with addiction or serious mental illness can be extraordinarily vulnerable. They need housing, treatment, medical care, mental health services, dignity, and compassion. But somewhere along the way, we seem to have confused compassion with exemption from responsibility.
And that raises a simple question: If you believe people should face few or no consequences for destructive behaviour, who is going to take responsibility for the consequences?
Here's my proposal: Sponsor 20.
If you believe that people who are addicted, homeless, or mentally ill should never be arrested, detained, or otherwise face meaningful consequences for their behaviour, volunteer to become the personal sponsor of 20 people. Not a social-media sponsor. Not someone who writes an opinion piece demanding compassion. You.
You get the phone call when one of your 20 gets into a fight. You deal with it when another becomes violent. You help clean up when someone's behaviour results in vandalism. You take responsibility when one of your 20 repeatedly terrorizes people on public transit. And when somebody turns a public playground into a bathroom, perhaps you can explain to the parents why their children should simply accept that this is the price of compassion.
Of course, I'm being deliberately provocative. But the underlying question is completely serious, because Vancouver's most vulnerable aren't the only people who deserve consideration.
When "Vulnerable" Meets the Real World
This isn't an abstract or theoretical debate in Vancouver.
In August 2026—just weeks after the World Cup drew thousands of visitors into Vancouver to celebrate together—the reality of street-level violence returned to the headlines. Zoey Bee was walking near Main Street and East Hastings Street around 9:30 p.m. when an unknown suspect approached her, violently assaulted her, and stole her cellphone. Photos shared online showed her face badly bruised with two black eyes as she warned others to stay vigilant.
Her experience is far from unique. On June 28, 2026, Sila Tekin was enjoying a summer day at Kitsilano Beach when a stranger came up behind her and struck her in the head with a large piece of driftwood in an unprovoked attack. The suspect, Carlos Caldera Duarte, was arrested nearby and charged with assault with a weapon—only to be released from custody shortly after.
That same month, Vancouver Police appealed for witnesses after a man walking near Nelson and Richards streets in Downtown Vancouver was punched from behind by a stranger, causing him to suffer a severe head injury when he struck the pavement.
Earlier in the year, police dealt with a disturbing series of alleged sidewalk assaults where women were physically targeted, shoulder-checked, or elbowed in the face. Dylan Brandon Gaita was charged with multiple counts of assault in connection with those attacks, including an incident on Commercial Drive.
And in January 2026, a 29-year-old woman was charged after a random knife attack left a victim with shoulder injuries near Hastings and Abbott streets in the Downtown Eastside.
These cases matter because behind every police report is an actual person. Someone was walking home. Someone was going to work. Someone was sitting on a beach. And suddenly, their day became a trip to the emergency room.
We can talk endlessly about the circumstances of the person who committed the offence—their addiction, mental health, housing situation, or trauma. Those factors matter. But the victim's circumstances matter too.
What about the nurse who has spent an entire shift caring for someone who is intoxicated or experiencing a mental health crisis—and then gets threatened, assaulted, or spat on?
What about the staff at the Union Gospel Mission, who dedicate themselves every day to helping people who are struggling, yet are exposed to severe disorder during every shift they volunteer at?
What about the small-business owner in Gastown or the Downtown Eastside who opens the doors every morning to discover another broken window, another theft, or another act of vandalism? Some business owners told me that there was an actual shortage of glass in Vancouver as windows in their neighbourhood had been broken so often.
What about the transit operator dealing with someone screaming or behaving violently? Are the seniors sitting two feet away from the person jumping and screaming while shouting obscenities also not vulnerable?
What about the elderly person waiting for a bus, or the parent who doesn't want their child encountering unpredictable, unsafe behaviour in a public playground?
Are they not vulnerable too?
Treatment Doesn't Have to Mean No Boundaries
This is where the conversation needs to become more honest. A person can be addicted and still be capable of harming another person. A person can be mentally ill and genuinely require treatment rather than conventional punishment. A person can be homeless and still be expected not to assault someone.
Those statements are not contradictory—they are the foundation of a functioning society.
A police charge is not proof of guilt, and severe mental illness or addiction should never be assumed simply because someone behaves erratically. But neither addiction nor mental illness should automatically erase the rights of victims.
We should absolutely distinguish between someone who commits a crime deliberately and someone whose severe mental illness makes them incapable of understanding or controlling their behaviour. But saying "this person needs treatment" cannot mean "there is nothing society can do."
Sometimes the compassionate response is not jail. Sometimes it is mandatory treatment, supervised care, psychiatric intervention, secure housing, or another structured environment. The answer cannot simply be: They are vulnerable. Leave them alone.
Because leaving someone alone is often the least compassionate thing we can do. And sometimes the person being abandoned isn't the person causing the chaos—it is the person being assaulted, the person being robbed, the nurse being threatened, the business owner paying thousands for repairs, the outreach worker trying desperately to help, and the family afraid to let their children play outside.
Compassion Has Two Directions
I don't want a Vancouver where people struggling with addiction or mental illness are treated as disposable. But I also don't want a Vancouver where ordinary citizens are expected to tolerate violence, intimidation, theft, vandalism, and public disorder because the person responsible has been labelled "vulnerable."
We can care about the person causing the harm and the person experiencing the harm at the same time. Those aren't mutually exclusive.
We don't need less compassion. We need more accountability attached to our compassion. Because if we continually tell people that they have no responsibility for their actions, eventually somebody else has to carry that weight.
Right now, that somebody else appears to be the nurse, the business owner, the transit worker, the outreach worker, the parent, the elderly passenger, the soup kitchen volunteer, the taxpayer, and the neighbourhood—everyone except the person causing the harm.
So here is my challenge: If you're convinced that consequences are cruel, that nobody should ever be forced into treatment, that criminal behaviour should always be excused by addiction or mental illness, and that society should simply accommodate whatever happens next—Sponsor 20.
Step up and take responsibility in a direct, practical way. Know their names. Answer the 2:00 a.m. phone call. Show up in person when a crisis erupts. Pay out of your own pocket for the shattered storefront window. Clean up the mess left on the sidewalk. Stand between them and the innocent people they've terrified. Navigate the medical system with them, and do the hard work required to help them actually get better.
Because compassion is easy when somebody else is paying the price. It’s easy when you write about it online or use it in a political campaign to make yourself feel better. But true compassion requires us to care about everyone—including the vulnerable person, their victims, their families, the people trying to help them, and the community they live in.
Compassion without accountability isn’t kindness. Sometimes it’s simply denying there is a problem; sometimes it’s refusing to deal with it. Either way, it helps no one.
Elke Porter at:
Westcoast German Media
LinkedIn: Elke Porter or
WhatsApp: +1 604 828 8788.
Public Relations. Communications. Education
Let’s bring your story to life — contact me for books, articles, blogs, and bold public relations ideas that make an impact.
TAGS: #Sponsor20Challenge #CompassionAndAccountability #VancouverVoices #PublicSafety #AccountabilityMatters #SafeStreetsForAll
Members Discussion